Sidis Archives Home

 

 

SIDIS vs THE NEW YORKER

"Limited Scrutiny"

wpe4D.jpg (228604 bytes)
The New Yorker Article

 

 


Sidis's Legal Brief

 

 

U.S. Appeals Court Decision

". . . a limited scrutiny may be had of the private life of any person who has achieved, or has had thrust upon him, the questionable and indefinable status of a "public figure".


Letter to Julius Eichel re settlement of lawsuit, "...my long fight against the principle of personal publicity."

 

 

"Anthony Lewis doesn't believe movie stars and other well-known persons are always properly deemed public figures. Lewis thus sees as mistaken the 1940 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Sidis v. F-R Publishing Corporation. The case arose when James Thurber, writing under a pseudonym for The New Yorker, targeted a former boy "genius," William James Sidis, who was then a quiet, eccentric, middle-aged man living in obscurity. Sidis sued for libel, but the Court ruled, in effect, that a person who once was famous is always famous. Lewis disagrees, emphasizing . . . that courts must balance the competing values of personal privacy and the public's right to know." FindLaw.com, Feb. 29, 2008

"THE LEGISLATION OF PRIVACY: NEW LAWS THAT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE: Technology is changing how we do everything, from connecting with friends to investigating our family history. While most of these changes are for the better, the reality is that many of these new technologies expose us to serious privacy risks, especially as legislation has struggled to keep up. " more from backgroundcheck.org